Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of artificial femoral head replacement in elderly patients with femoral neck fractures. Methods A total of 50 elderly patients with femoral neck fractures admitted to the Second People's Hospital of Dongying City from May 2021 to May 2024 were enrolled as study participants. These patients were randomly divided into two groups using a lottery method, with 25 cases in each group. The control group underwent total hip arthroplasty, while the test group received artificial femoral head replacement. Operative indicators, early complication outcomes, and hip function were assessed in both groups. Results In terms of dimensions such as complication outcomes, the comparison between the two sets of data shows no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). However, the test group exhibited less blood loss, lower costs, and shorter operation times compared to the control group (P<0.05). Hip function scores were evaluated after a 3-month follow-up, revealing higher scores in the test group than in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusions Artificial femoral head replacement demonstrates favorable clinical outcomes for elderly patients with femoral neck fractures. This surgical approach reduces treatment costs, improves economic feasibility, and enhances hip function. For unstable elderly patients with femoral neck fractures, poor general conditions, and multiple complications, this procedure can improve prognosis and therapeutic efficacy.
Key words
Femoral neck fracture /
Artificial femoral head replacement surgery /
Elderly population /
Hip joint function /
complication /
Quality of life
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 孙鑫. PFNA内固定与人工股骨头置换术治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折的效果对比研究[J].中华养生保健,2023,41(24):191-193.
[2] 陈永,王柯,李东辉,等. 生物型与水泥型人工股骨头置换治疗老年EvansⅢ~Ⅳ型股骨转子间骨折疗效对比[J]. 中国烧伤创疡杂志,2023,35(6):464-467.
[3] 朱亚峰. 双极人工股骨头置换术与全髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中国实用医药,2023,18(21):74-76.
[4] 中华医学会骨科学分会创伤骨科学组,中国医师协会骨科医师分会创伤专家工作委员会.成人股骨颈骨折诊治指南[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志,2018,20(11):921-928.
[5] 郭建陈. 人工股骨头置换术对老年股骨颈骨折合并高血压患者的临床疗效及安全性分析[J]. 中西医结合心血管病电子杂志,2023,11(24):25-28.
[6] 章斌,郭锦明,刘俊,等. 生物型假体与加长骨水泥型假体人工股骨头置换术治疗高龄不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2023,38(8):838-841.
[7] 成源. 微创股骨近端防旋髓内钉和人工股骨头置换术治疗骨质疏松性老年髋部骨折的临床疗效对比[J]. 中国医疗器械信息,2023,29(12):65-67.
[8] 李泽伟,樊俊俊,郝治龙,等. 人工股骨头置换术与股骨近端防旋髓内钉固定术治疗高龄患者不稳定股骨转子间骨折临床对比观察[J]. 山东医药,2023,63(15):76-79.
[9] 瞿晖. 全髋关节置换术与人工股骨头置换术在老年股骨颈骨折中的效果对比[J]. 基层医学论坛,2023,27(7):61-63.
[10] 梁耘,张斌,李昌坤,等. 不同手术时点人工股骨头置换术联合加速康复锻炼对高龄老年股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效[J]. 贵州医科大学学报,2023,48(2):233-238.